Difference between revisions of "Kobayashi Maru scenario"

From Federation Space - Official Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Update Academy}}
+
The '''''Kobayashi Maru'' scenario''' was an infamous no-win scenario that was part of the curriculum for command-track cadets at [[Starfleet Academy]] in the [[23rd century]].
  
  
__NOTOC__
+
It was primarily used to assess a cadet's discipline, character, command and decision-making capabilities when facing an impossible situation, as there is no one answer to the problem.
[[Image:Kobayashi Maru scenario bridge.jpg|thumb|The Kobayashi Maru simulator in 2285]]
 
  
The '''''Kobayashi Maru'' scenario''' was an infamous no-win scenario that was part of the curriculum for command-track cadets at [[Starfleet Academy]] in the [[23rd century]]. It was primarily used to assess a cadet's discipline, character and command capabilities when facing an impossible situation as there is no one answer to the problem.
 
  
In the scenario, a cadet was placed in command of a [[starship]] on patrol near the [[Klingon Neutral Zone]]. The starship would receive a distress signal]] from the ''USS Kobayashi Maru'', a civilian freighter that had been disabled in the zone after having struck a [[gravitic mine]]. If the cadet chose to enter the [[neutral zone]] in violation of treaties, the starship would be confronted by three [[Klingon]] {{ShipClass|K't'inga}} [[battle cruiser]]s.  The test was considered a no-win scenario because it was impossible for the cadet to simultaneously save the ''Kobayashi Maru'', avoid a fight with the Klingons and escape from the neutral zone with the starship intact. A cadet's choice of how to handle the rescue operation gave great insight into his or her command decision-making.
+
In the scenario, a cadet is placed in command of a [[starship]] on patrol near the Federation-Klingon border. The starship would receive a distress signal from the "''USS Kobayashi Maru''", a civilian freighter that had been disabled after having struck a "gravitic mine." If the cadet chose to enter the neutral zone between the border, which would be in violation of treaties, the starship would be confronted by three [[Klingon]] [[battle cruiser]]s.  The test was considered a no-win scenario because it was impossible for the cadet to simultaneously save the ''Kobayashi Maru'', avoid a fight with the Klingons, ''and'' escape from the neutral zone with the starship intact. A cadet's choice of how to handle the rescue operation gave great insight into his or her command decision-making.
  
In the [[2250s]], [[James T. Kirk]] became the first (and only known) cadet to ever beat the no-win scenario. After taking the test and failing twice, Kirk took the test a third time after surreptitiously reprogramming the [[computer]] to make it possible to win the scenario.
 
  
Kirk was subsequently awarded a commendation for "original thinking" and later commented, wistfully, that his stunt "had the virtue of never having been tried." Kirk would later defend his "cheating" by arguing that he didn't believe in the no-win scenario.  Ironically, Kirk also defended the test itself by suggesting, "How we face death is at least as important as how we face life."
+
In the [[2250s]], [[James T. Kirk]] became the first (and only known) cadet to ever beat the no-win scenario. After taking the test and failing twice, Kirk took the test a third time after secretly reprogramming the computer to make it possible to win the scenario. Kirk was subsequently awarded a commendation for "original thinking" and later commented, wistfully, that his stunt "had the virtue of never having been tried." Kirk would later defend his "cheating" by arguing that he didn't believe in the no-win scenario.  Ironically, Kirk also defended the test itself by suggesting, "How we face death is at least as important as how we face life."
  
[[Image:Saavik and Kirk.jpg|thumb|Admiral Kirk discusses Saavik's performance with her.]]
 
In [[2285]], Kirk, then an [[admiral]] serving as an instructor at the Academy, supervised [[Lieutenant]] [[Saavik]]'s performance in the ''Kobayashi Maru'' scenario.  Former {{USS|Enterprise|NCC-1701}} crew members [[Spock]], [[Hikaru Sulu|Sulu]], [[Nyota Uhura|Uhura]] and [[Leonard McCoy|McCoy]] participated as "actors" in the simulation.  Saavik's performance was predictably dismal; as Kirk observed, "She destroyed the simulator room and [the crew] with it."
 
  
The term "''Kobayashi Maru''" may be a slang term for any hopeless situation in the 23rd century, at least in Starfleet culture.  Leonard McCoy considered his and James T. Kirk's imprisonment on [[Rura Penthe]] to be a "''Kobayashi Maru''" and told Kirk as much, on their first night at the penal mine.
+
In [[2285]], Kirk, then an [[admiral]] served as an Instructor at the Academy, and supervised many performances in the ''Kobayashi Maru'' scenario.
  
A similar simulation was later used in the [[24th century]].  It involved a damaged [[Ferengi]] ship as well as [[Romulan]] {{ShipClass|D'deridex}} [[Warbird]]s, instead of a civilian freighter and Klingon battle cruisers, and was performed on the [[holodeck]].
 
  
 +
The term "''Kobayashi Maru''" may be sometimes be used as a slang term for any hopeless situation in the 23rd century, at least in Starfleet culture.
  
  
  
  
== See also ==
 
* [[Bridge Officer's Test]]
 
  
== Appendices ==
+
=== Fun Fact: ===
=== Background ===
+
[[Spock]] once stated that he had never taken the '''Kobayashi Maru''' test, suggesting the test may have been introduced in the period between Spock's Academy training and Kirk's.  
Screenwriter [[Jack B. Sowards]] named the scenario after the Kobayashi family who were his neighbors.
 
  
Spock stated that he had never taken the ''Kobayashi Maru'' test, suggesting the test may have been introduced in the period between Spock's Academy training and Kirk's. However, it is also possible that, as a [[science officer]] for much of his Starfleet career, Spock was not required to take the test. It is also possible that, as in the [[alternate reality]], Spock had a role in designing the ''Kobayashi Maru'' test; he may have never taken it himself precisely because he was the program's designer. In his death scene at the conclusion of, Spock describes his sacrifice as his solution to the scenario. On the ''Star Trek'' [[audio commentary]], Orci states he imagined that Spock also programmed the test in the prime reality, and that Kirk met him the same way after cheating.
+
However, it is also possible that, as a [[science officer]] for much of his Starfleet career, Spock was not required to take the test.  
 +
 
 +
It is also possible that Spock had a role in designing the ''Kobayashi Maru'' test; he may have never taken it himself precisely because he was the program's designer.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[category:academy]]
 +
[[category:intelligence]]

Latest revision as of 17:44, 13 September 2021

The Kobayashi Maru scenario was an infamous no-win scenario that was part of the curriculum for command-track cadets at Starfleet Academy in the 23rd century.


It was primarily used to assess a cadet's discipline, character, command and decision-making capabilities when facing an impossible situation, as there is no one answer to the problem.


In the scenario, a cadet is placed in command of a starship on patrol near the Federation-Klingon border. The starship would receive a distress signal from the "USS Kobayashi Maru", a civilian freighter that had been disabled after having struck a "gravitic mine." If the cadet chose to enter the neutral zone between the border, which would be in violation of treaties, the starship would be confronted by three Klingon battle cruisers. The test was considered a no-win scenario because it was impossible for the cadet to simultaneously save the Kobayashi Maru, avoid a fight with the Klingons, and escape from the neutral zone with the starship intact. A cadet's choice of how to handle the rescue operation gave great insight into his or her command decision-making.


In the 2250s, James T. Kirk became the first (and only known) cadet to ever beat the no-win scenario. After taking the test and failing twice, Kirk took the test a third time after secretly reprogramming the computer to make it possible to win the scenario. Kirk was subsequently awarded a commendation for "original thinking" and later commented, wistfully, that his stunt "had the virtue of never having been tried." Kirk would later defend his "cheating" by arguing that he didn't believe in the no-win scenario. Ironically, Kirk also defended the test itself by suggesting, "How we face death is at least as important as how we face life."


In 2285, Kirk, then an admiral served as an Instructor at the Academy, and supervised many performances in the Kobayashi Maru scenario.


The term "Kobayashi Maru" may be sometimes be used as a slang term for any hopeless situation in the 23rd century, at least in Starfleet culture.



Fun Fact:

Spock once stated that he had never taken the Kobayashi Maru test, suggesting the test may have been introduced in the period between Spock's Academy training and Kirk's.

However, it is also possible that, as a science officer for much of his Starfleet career, Spock was not required to take the test.

It is also possible that Spock had a role in designing the Kobayashi Maru test; he may have never taken it himself precisely because he was the program's designer.